nbc6.net
Thursday, July 24, 2008, 9:35 pm
Register to vote plus get other important info More


Search 
Search IBS  Search the Web
news
E-Mail News Alerts
Get breaking news, daily headlines and more.
More
ALLEGED TERROR PLOT ARRESTS
  • Images: 'Liberty City 7' Suspects

  • Images: Alleged Terror Plot Arrests

  • Images: Community Activists Speak Out

  • PDF: Indictment


  • FBI Video In Liberty City 7 Case Leaked Without Authorization

    POSTED: 7:01 pm EDT August 25, 2006
    UPDATED: 8:34 pm EDT August 25, 2006

    The U.S. attorney's office is asking a federal judge to investigate the unauthorized release of secret FBI surveillance video in the Liberty City Seven terrorism case.

    The video involved a secret FBI undercover videotape of terrorism suspects allegedly planning to launch war on the United States, NBC 6's Jeff Burnside reported. The video also shows images taken by defendants, according to prosecutors, of the Miami-area buildings they allegedly considered blowing up.

    The complete videotape was leaked to a local TV station. The leak has led the U.S. attorney back to court to file a motion with federal Judge Joan Lenard, urging that "the court should make inquiry regarding release to the media."

    Mike Tein, who used to prosecute federal cases, is on the committee that makes rules for federal court. He said releasing evidence in advance of the trial risks tainting people who might become jurors.

    "Because, a trial -- that's the show. That's the game. That's the time when the playing field is level and the judge is calling balls and strikes as she sees fit. What they've done -- whoever did this -- is put their thumb on the scale of justice before the trial has begun," Tein said.

    The so-called Liberty City Seven were all assigned defense attorneys, and only those attorneys get the videotape and other evidence, called discovery, so they can prepare for the trial.

    The U.S. attorney's office said, "Only one set of discovery materials has been released to date, and that was to a defense attorney."

    According to other defense attorneys, Nathan Clark was the attorney who received the materials.

    "The release of information like this, while troublesome from the standpoint of a lawyer and ethics, I'm not so sure it's detrimental to the government's case," said criminal defense attorney Mycki Ratzan.

    "The judges in this district take these violations very seriously, and you can expect that whoever did this will be severely punished and could be kicked out of the bar," Tein said.

    It is not illegal for the media to publish sealed materials under the First Amendment.

    The U.S. attorney's office would not comment, and Lenard is out of town.

    The trial is scheduled for March.


    Sponsored Links




    Links We Like
    Sponsored Content
    If you’ve been interested in growing your own organic fruits and vegetables, try these helpful hints and get growing. More

    Find all the right treatment options for rheumatoid arthritis and how to prevent joint damage and control pain. More

    Looking to go back to school, but afraid that you don't have time because of a hectic schedule? You may find that the flexibility of an online education makes it an easy choice.More

    If you’re looking for a great place to live, look no further. Our guide to some of the best neighborhoods in the U.S. is the first and last place you need to look. More

    Like online video? Then you'll love Now See This.

    Links We Like includes a selection of information, tools and resources from our partners and sponsors.

    Portions 2008 Internet Broadcasting Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertising Information | Contact Us